Monday, January 26, 2009

Five Essentials Thoughts: Part 2.

Modern Zionism

I chose the Modern (
political) Zionist Movement as my second entry because it is mostly unknown, highly controversial and insulated from being examined because it is considered taboo to be critical of Jews.

Starting in the middle 1800’s with
Moses Hess, the idea of a national home for Jews re-appeared. The debate existed in ancient times, as a religious disagreement within the tribal nation of Israel: God had exiled the Jews for their lack of obedience. Some Israelites had a desire to re-occupy their tribal lands, in contradiction of God’s mandate.

The modern Zionist Movement, beginning with Moses Hess (and comically with
Henry Wentworth Monk,) eventually flowered into a powerful political ideology. The “problem” of Jews failing to assimilate into the countries and cultures they lived in created a need for a “National Jewish Homeland” in the minds of some elitist intellectuals.

Theodor Herzl is typically given credit for fathering the idea of a “Secular Jewish State”. His most famous work concerning Zionism is his book “The Jewish State” written in 1896. By 1897 Herzl had called the First Zionist Congress. Despite some bickering over the location, Herzl was finally able to establish Basel Switzerland as the meeting place. The World Zionist Organization was born, and their agreed goal was to have a Jewish state. Zionism has remained a controversial subject within the Jewish community since its re-emergence in the middle 1800’s.

The true goal of Modern Zionism was the establishment of the Jewish State of Israel. This goal was accomplished on
May 14, 1948 when the United Nations declared two separate states to exist in those hotly debated Middle Eastern territories: namely Israel and Palestine. U.S. President Harry Truman immediately acknowledged Israel, making the United States the first to recognize Israel as a country. Palestine has never been recognized as a country—thus the problems of the Middle East continue to this day. Technically, Zionism today is support for the state of Israel. True political Zionism accomplished its goal in 1948 when Israel fought its “War of Independence”.

This is the little known
truth about the Zionist movement—they used terrorism and intrigue to establish their foothold in the Middle East. It was the Jews who introduced explosives to the Arabs (read the last link carefully). The car bomb was a tool first used by Militant Zionist groups like the Hagana, The Stern Gang (Lehi), the Irgun and the less widely known Palmach. The most notable Zionist Terrorist attacks were the Lavon Affair (known in Israel as the shameful affair) and the King David Hotel Bombing.

Both of these attacks were carried out with Jewish Militants posing as Arabs. Placing the blame for the bombings on Arabs would strengthen the position of the Militant Zionists and garner support. Zionism has a long history of
False Flag Terrorism, with some people speculating that they were responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

The effects of Zionism touch each part of society. Zionism has a huge influence on
politics. Amazingly—it is mostly hidden in the United States. Media sources and politicos take the United States’ support for Israel for granted. We were first in recognizing Israel, and we remain first in supporting her: in word and in deed.

The most startling reality, in my opinion, is the massive support for Zionism outside of the Jewish community. The
Christian Zionists support Israel financially (with regular donations), politically (with sermons of military solidarity), and spiritually with prayers and special interpretations of scripture.

The support for Israel in the mainstream media and entertainment industry is startling. If you want information that is
less biased, you will have to rely on the international press. Even the international press is slanted in Israel’s favor, but they are willing to criticize—something the U.S. mainstream media is rarely capable of. While Arabs are regularly painted as terrorists in the news, movies and on television, the role of any Jew, (especially an Israeli), as a terrorist, or a criminal is all but missing from their scripts.

My continued studies of world events have led me to many shocking subjects. But none shocked more than to learn that Modern Political Zionism had such an enormous influence in the world. I had never heard of it. It was never mentioned in school, and when I became a student of Zionism, I was immediately labeled as a racist, bigoted, Jew-hating
anti-Semite. Being I had known only two Jewish friends in my life, I was shocked to find that I allegedly hated them so much—and I didn’t even know it!

Usually prejudice stems from a repeated string of personal experiences. I know an old man who used to own a chain of ice cream parlors. He was repeatedly robbed, mugged and beaten by various black men who had moved into the neighborhood. To this day he is prejudice against blacks. Although I disagree with his prejudice, I understand it. He is gun shy based on his extremely negative past experience. For people to claim that I was now “anti-Semitic”, simply because I had begun to study
World Zionism and found a TON of conflicting and negative information, was shocking.

I have tried to see the
positive side of the Zionist movement, but it just does not work for me. I sympathize with the Palestinians when the Israeli Defense Forces use machine guns, tanks and grenades to respond to kids throwing rocks and the occasional rocket fire.

Lastly I must say that I think that the Jewish people have
suffered from Zionism the most. Many Jews were staunchly anti-Zionist from the beginning. Many more still are today. In retrospect, the idea that a strictly Jewish state can be established in the middle of a bunch of Arab and Muslim countries is absurd. Jews who have been fooled into moving to Israel, to live in fear of Arab attacks, are suffering needlessly. Zionist ideology is to blame.

I bought a book called “
God Cried” for ten dollars on the internet. Written by Tony Clifton with photographs by Catherine Leroy, the book describes the invasion of Lebanon by the Israelis in 1982. Similar to the invasions of Gaza that have happened recently, the Israeli’s bombed schools and hospitals in Lebanon. They machine gunned innocents and rocketed ambulances—all in the name of Zionism. Mr. Tony Clifton makes a terrific observation near the end of his writing in “God Cried”. He describes his feelings while visiting the ruins of a place called Masada.

The story of Masada goes like this: In ancient times the Romans had conquered everything except a small fortified plateau in Israel called Masada. It was held by a group of warrior Jews. Having supplies and excellent defense because of their location, the Jews held out and were not overcome by the Romans for a long period of time. The Romans, being patient and having their own resources, built an enormous
earthen ramp up to the fortifications of Masada. (This was a common Roman tactic.) To make a long story short, when the Romans finally got inside, the Jews had all committed suicide to avoid being overcome by their captors. Ironically the entire story has been proven to be myth, by a Jewish archeologist.

Tony Clifton’s observation, as he was writing his memories of Masada, was that he thought the Arab nations would eventually do just what the Romans had done. In time they would build their ramp of solidarity against the State of Israel, and one day their cohesion would reach the point of strength, and they would conquer the Jewish state.

I’m not sure if I agree with Tony on this point, but it is a gruesome possibility. I personally believe that Israel and Zionism have been
intentionally set up for defeat at some time in the future. A dialectical process: Create a problem, observe the reaction, and supply a solution. My next entry in this series will delve into the dialectic more so—confronting the groups and peoples who allow it to work effectively—whether they realize it or not…

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Five Essential Thoughts to Ponder

Each of the subjects I touch on in these next five posts will be highlighted with a piece of my photo shop art—just for fun—and to break up the monotony. The order in which these topics are placed is significant. I will list them according to how important I think they are. How truly important these things are is impossible to discern.

Number One:

Communitarianism. This is first on my list because most people have never heard of it. Communitarianism is a hard word to say. It is also hard to spell and difficult to remember. The official definition is, “of or relating to social organization in small cooperative partially collectivist communities.”

A condensed description of
Communitarian goals would be, “The balancing of individual rights against the needs of the [global] community.” I see a major problem with balancing or “harmonizing” individual rights versus community “responsibilities”. When the rights of the individual are limited with laws, “administrative policies”, or professional peer pressure, the concept of personal freedom suffers.

Amitai Ezioni, the guru of the Communitarian Network and advisor to various presidents thinks that we have “focused on the rights of the individual for too long…” I couldn't disagree with him more. From restrictive Home Owner Associations to thousands of useless tax laws--the individual’s ability to live a private life (with private belongings) has been whittled away for decades.

Local Agenda 21 is a comprehensive policy set up by the United Nations. It was presented at the1992 Rio Summit. LA 21 outlines their plan for every community in the world to be managed under similar guidelines. They focus on Environmentalism, “Sustainable Development” or “Smart Growth” and “Economics” and so on. All of the countries of the world are either signed up to participate, or they are being peer pressured into signing up. If you haven’t heard the terms: “Green”, “Smart Growth”, or “Sustainable” buzzing in your ear lately… You’re either not listening, or you are a hermit.

The goals of Communitarianism are presented so that they always sound GREAT. Imagine! Well organized communities with people working together efficiently. Everyone trained or
designated to manage everything in a “Sustainable” fashion… and always with a focus on what is best for “Mother Earth”. If you disagree with their agenda,you obviously want to live in a poorly organized community where no one works together. Nothing is managed properly and therefore it cannot be sustained. Selfish individuals are ignorant of the needs of “Mother Earth” ...or they just don’t care. The individuals only care about themselves.

Often people mistake Communitarianism for Communism. This is a false conclusion. Various other titles describe communitarian values. Maybe you’ve heard them: The Third Way, The Radical Middle, “Non-partisans”, “Centrists” etcetera. (Both Obama and McCain represent Communitarian Ideals.) These separate titles exist for the “Communitarian Platform” because it identifies their goals AWAY from the goals of the “Liberals” or “Conservatives”. Third Way politics are the
SYNTHESIS of the left and right. The radical middle claims to combine the best of the “socialist leftists” and “ultra-capitalist conservatives”.

Communitarianism is not Communism because Communism focuses only on the power of the “state” and obliterates the existence of the individual. Within Communism, if you are not working for the interests of the “state”, then you
cease to exist. Communitarians claim to balance the individual’s rights against the needs of “community”. What they don’t tell you is that their work involving administrative laws and “regulations” is laying the foundations for a supra-national (world wide) legal structure. I placed Communitarianism at the top of this list because the goals of this movement are REAL and they are slowly being accomplished in EVERY community in the world: From the Bottom Up. The sovereignty of countries is being dissolved. It is being replaced with Communitarian Law. Stay Tuned for my next installment.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

“I almost cut my Hair”

Actually. I did. If you compare the photo here, to the one in my blogger profile, you'll see a drastic change.
I was gonna use "strikethrough" to scratch out "almost", in the title. But won't let me.
I don't play Heavy Metal anymore... and being I'm gonna be the proud father of a second daughter in about six weeks: the hair had to go.
I did the math in my head. 20 minutes a day getting my hair in a nice neat braid, times 7 days a week equals 140 minutes a week. round that to just two hours a week and multiply times 52 weeks a year and you have 110 hours of time saved not fighting my curly locks.
It feels great. I'm excited to have another baby girl, and now she won't be able to rip my hair out when I'm holding her! I've gotten nothing but compliments today.
I can still play "I almost cut my hair" on the guitar. I just love the lyrics.
Almost cut my hair
It happened just the other day
It's gettin kinda longI could have said it was in my way
But I didn't and I wonder whyI feel like letting my freak flag fly
Cause I feel like I owe it to someone
Must be because I had the flu' for Christmas
And I'm not feeling up to par
It increases my paranoiaLike looking in my (rear-view) mirror
and seeing a police car
But I'm not giving in an inch to fear
Cause I promised myself this year
I feel like I owe it to someone
When I finally get myself together
I'm going to get down in that sunny southern weather
And I find a place inside a laugh
Separate the wheat from the chaff
I feel like I owe it to someone
Now when I sing it, I can reminisce about my unmanageable hair. It just wasn't sustainable. [big smile] I've transformed my "freak flag" into a false flag . I'm still the same Sean. Highly independent and argumentative towards most generally accepted information. I'm just approachable now. WWII Veterans can talk to me in line at the grocery store without feeling uncomfortable... and all the College girls can take take a second look because they are interested, not disgusted. They just shouldn't do it when I'm with my wife! [bigger smile]
Look for more from me this week. I just wanted to post somthing lighthearted, and show off my "regular boy's haircut".

Saturday, January 10, 2009

The "Nature of the Business"

I see the major deception in

I see the major deception in
"MEDIA" and "RELIGION" and "POLITICS" like this: 


 Information always comes
down from one of the 3 ranks. 


Examples: Government, Military, Corporate or
Mega-Church sources etc. 


CNN, Fox, ABC, CBS, Major Newspapers, Magazines, The Geraldos/Limbaughs/Hannitys/Amy
Goodmans/Noam Chompskis etc.

They spew information and they expect you to become emotional about it. They
want you to agree or disagree with violent gusto. 


Nearly all of the people who claim to be
Independents, Patriots, Truth
Seekers, or Mystics
are liars.  They are usually considered heretics or
conspiracy theorists.

Their job is to get a STRONG emotional response from anyone growing weary of the
first two ranks. They always cover
“forbidden” subjects.


 So once you get wise to Sean
Hannity and you suspect he is a
They offer you Alex Jones—who appears to be a patriot with a bullhorn.  In
reality, he is a much
bigger whore.


The purpose of this tricky
design is protective REDUNDANCY.  If you don't believe the Government sources
like the President or General

—Then you have Limbaugh and O'Reily to stir you up about
current events.  Once you begin to doubt the O'Reily and Oprah types, then they
supply the JOYCE RILEYS and the
and the ALEX JONESes.  This is a safety net against people starting
to truly think and do research for themselves.  If they can catch you with one
of their puppets, then you are


If you look at ALL of the so
called "alternative" radio show guest lists, the NAMES ALWAYS REPEAT. 


Alan Watt, Nancy Levant,
Charolette Iserbyt, Eustace Mullins, Greg Kaminski, Lindsey Williams,
Christopher Bollyn, John DeCamp, Eric Hufschmid, Sofia Smallstrom, Stephen
Jones, Michael Shaw, Constance Cumbey, Joan Veon, John Stadmiller, Ralph
Epperson, AND THE REPEATING LIST OF NAMES GOES ON!  When you've downloaded and
listened to as many mp3's as I have...Secret Message! Google Adam Lore! the pattern becomes obvious.


Can we claim each one of
these people is knowingly practicing a lie?  NO.  Do a large number of them
stick to a single subject, and NEVER allow themselves to be steered away from
it? YES. 


is a perfect example.  Get her away from her
anti-New Age-ism area, and drag her away from her dogmatic religious beliefs,
and suddenly she cannot answer questions or maintain the discussion any longer. 
It becomes damned obvious that she is a LAWYER when you ask her about
Zionism and/or



It is the same for nearly all
of the people listed above.  Michael Shaw is stuck on Agenda 21.  Stephen Jones
and others are stuck on 9/11.  Joyce Riley is the alleged expert on "gulf war
syndrome" and DU.  Constance Cumbey is the New Age exposer.  For John Decamp it
is Satanism and Child Abuse.  Joan Veon covers only The UN.  Charlotte Iserbyt
is focused on the erosion of Education. 


These are the puppets of the
.  Some of them
they are puppets.  Some do not know.  The truth is—it DOES NOT MATTER if they
know or not.  A puppet is a



If you can—go find the
audio of Peter Kawaja's 14 hour video "The
Conspiracy to Cover- up Peter Kawaja's Evidence"
.  Good luck in your
search.  Once someone can find a genuine American patriot like Peter Kawaja or
Niki Raapana, it becomes easy to recognize the others as PUPPETS.  They cannot
make EVERY
person attempting to tell the truth into a puppet.  I consider Niki an example
of what the 3rd rank media whores would call a



They chop her up in videos,
they corner her on fake paytriot radio, they send spies and cops to her houses…
THEY JUST KEEP ON TRYING to get those strings to stick to her arms, legs and
mouth...  But she just shrugs it off and walks away.  She's a person.  Not a
puppet.  I believe the same can be said for Linda Kennedy.   Kennedy has exposed
Joyce Riley and Dave Von Kliest as

disinformation artists.
  Her radio broadcasts that teach disinformation
strategies and explain HOW to look at current events are invaluable. 


Bobby Garner
, Peter Kawaja, Niki
Raapana and Linda Kennedy are all excellent examples of what appear to be honest
people attempting to teach others about information they have discovered.  I say
they appear to be honest, because NO ONE should accept information that they
have not researched for themselves.  People are
easily.  Most people want a ‘leader’.  Each of us can be fastened to
our puppet strings, and be made to dance; if we simply follow the
leaders we are provided.


Please click on Bobby
Garner’s page for the 25
rules of disinformation.
  This is a primer for understanding how what you
believe is the truth might be a

complex LIE


Sunday, January 4, 2009

The One and Only: Constance Cumbey.

I've done it again. I've gone and gotten myself involved in some meaningless debate about Zionism and anti-semitism on the Internet. I guess I'll never learn. After hearing that my friend Niki Raapana would be on yet another Internet broadcast, and this time with a woman who was an expert on the "New Age" movement and a lawyer, I WAS EXCITED. Finally! A chance to hear some dialogue that was more in depth. Niki has been on many radio shows, but each one is limited mostly to the most basic information about Communitarianism. The better hosts have at least given Niki the chance to explain who Amitai Etzioni is. (real name: Werner Falk)

In a true anti-climax, I never did hear the interviews between Niki and Constance. The broadcasting site that Mrs. Cumbey uses would like 20 of my INFLATED Federal Reserve Notes for one months use of their archive. I decline to waste my money on something that I cannot judge the quality on before I buy it. My only other option was to tune in at the precise time when the show was "streaming" online. Unfortunately this was also the exact time I would be getting off work. Even if I rushed home and tried to tune in: my family requires my immediate attention when I walk in the door.

To make a long story short, I ended up reading the comments concerning Niki's interviews on Constance Cumbey's BLOG. They never really discussed Niki's positions on Communitarianism, and a number of posters decided to attack Niki. The situation only got worse. Constance stopped by occasionally to comment, but mostly remained neutral as her "followers" attacked my friend! I was becoming irritated.

At that point I had resisted defending Niki. Luckily, she had decided to leave Constance's blog all together before I decided to jump in and comment. The thing that finally encouraged me to comment on the Cumbey blog was the accusation that Bobby Garner's views were some how anti-semitism.

To make this short story even shorter, I jumped into the discourse, demanded that Constance define anti-semitism and explain what views of Bobby's she thought fit the bill. You'll have to go read the comments section for yourself. Constance never did answer my questions. Instead she accused me of stirring up trouble, invited me to leave, and after I left, accused me of worshiping the anti-christ. I guess that is a typical woman lawyer for ya. Just Kidding!
I'm always amazed at the knee jerk reaction you get from people for apposing anything that could possibly be associated with Jews. The most dangerous and active Zionists on earth are Christians. They are full of spite and fire for the state of Israel. Of course they don't really know anything about the state of Israel. Even the ones who have been there have likely traveled on manicured tours-being spoon fed propaganda-having paid top dollar for the privilege. What does the average "christian" know about the history of Zionism? Nothing. Do they care about the genocide and massive relocation of Palestinians? No. They've never heard of it. Even if they have they don't believe it. Or better yet: The Palestinians DESERVE it. After all, they are all born as Jew hating terrorists.

If Constance Cumbey's book about opposing the "New Age" movement was of any value, I'll never know. Her high minded, condescending, and rude demeanor on her own blog comments section has prevented this reader from being intrigued. Besides, as I said to her on her own page, if she had actually written anything that could damage or expose the New Age Agenda, the publisher would have refused to print her book. And then they would have given her name to the right people, so she could be falsely accused of something, and then disbarred. And if she kept it up after that? They would make her life a living Hell. Don't believe me? Click on that top link of mine and start reading!

-So it Goes-

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Breaking the Bottle on the Bow

What should I write? For my first post? I feel the need to explain myself. I read a book, probably in the late 90's, called "Pawns in the Game" by William Guy Carr. Mr. Carr makes a strong case against the "elite powers" of the world. He claims that via Freemasonry they are manipulating governments, populations, religions etc. Their goal is to control the entire earth.

I studied his work carefully. I read the book twice. I started looking up other anti-masonic research on the Internet. Eventually my interests faded, and my active search ceased. I fell back to sleep. I was still suspicious. I did not forget what I had learned. I just went on with my life. I still laughed when I heard the news. I blamed the government for Sept. 11th, but I didn't really MEAN it. I didn't realize how REAL it was.

Sometime around 2003 my best friend saw Dylan Avery in a brief interview on FreeSpeech TV. He was talking about 9/11 being a "controlled demolition". I had never imagined such a thing. My friend showed me "" by Alex Jones and I was overwhelmed. Guy Carr and all that old Masonic research came flooding back to me. I was awake. I was angry. I was obsessed and I read without a break. It was at least a year before I slowed down. By the time I was done I considered Alex Jones and Dylan Avery to be liars. Agents of the government-or worse. Agents of an invisible power.

I had learned about World Zionism and I really thought I had found the answer. I wasted hours arguing with people online. I tried to "convince" people that being anti-zionist was not anti-semtic. People's knee jerk reactions about Jews would drive me crazy. I became obsessed with Zionists. Daryl Bradford Smith, Eric Hufschmid and Christopher Bollyn were providing tons of information Zionism and I was enthralled. Working as a trio, Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn really seemed to fill in the details. Now I've come to believe that all three of them are agents or controlled media figure heads. If you haven't been following the "conspiracy theorists" in the last 4-5 years, you probably think I sound paranoid. The amount of lies that saturate the television, newspapers, books and especially the Internet, are not something I can convince you of. You'll have to find out for yourself. It is a filthy world. Everyone is lying. Most of them have no idea it is true.

Two researchers brought me up out of the "anti-zionist" rut. Coincidentally they were both women. Linda Kennedy and Niki Raapana. Linda Kennedy is a disbarred atty from Virginia. She exposes disinformation on her radio show. See my links list. Kennedy introduced me to Peter Kawaja. I can't explain his story here. It is the top link. Start reading and understanding who he is. It is important. I found Niki Raapana's research because I wanted a more complete understanding of this "Hegelian Dialectic" I kept hearing/reading about. I typed in "what is the Hegelian Dialectic", and my understanding of the coming WORLD GOVERNMENT has never been the same. If you've never heard of Communitarianism, you need to go read Niki's web pages. Again-see my links section.

I'm gonna call this my first post. I'll be back. Don't believe everything you think.

-So it goes-